Q Evaluate Last week you submitted a draft of your final multimedia presentation and received peer feedback. This assignment gives you an opportunity to receive additional feedback from your instructor on your revised draft prior to your final submission in Module 8 (by Thursday). Your instructor will assess your draft as they would your final project and you will receive feedback as well as a percentage grade. See notes regarding evaluation below as your draft (like your Lit Review draft) will be scored slightly differently than your final submission. Step 1: Review your peer feedback from Module 6 • And make changes as you see fit. If you're are making very few changes, you will need to justify this in Step 2. o This might also be a good time to review the multimedia presentation requirements outlined in Module 6, as well as the multimedia presentation evaluation rubric (see bottom of page). Step 2: Attach a Word document regarding feedback addressed and sought In a single page, indicate what peer feedback you've addressed and any specific questions or concerns you want to ask your instructor. • This might relate to changes you've made or feedback you disagree with and want another opinion about. Step 3: Attach your revised presentation draft and submit assignment • By Thursday, 11:59 pm ET to allow sufficient time for your instructor to provide feedback. Evaluation The LAPSY 498 Multimedia Presentation Draft for Instructor Submission explains how your efforts in this assignment will be evaluated. • Note that a similar grading approach to the Literature Review Draft is being employed where "proficient" achievement will be sufficient to earn you full points on this draft. However, improvements will need to be made to reach "exemplary" achievement and full points on your final submission. Project work assignments are worth 50% of your final grade. Outcomes This activity assesses the following module outcomes: • M7-01: Deliver a complex visual and oral presentation within appropriate constraints. (CO1, CO2, CO3, CO4, CO6) • M7-04: Incorporate feedback as appropriate to strengthen presentation quality. (CO4, CO6) Audio/Video Instructions Outcomes Rubric Download Rubric Return to Learning Pathway Rubric LA_PSY 498 Multimedia Presentation Draft Submission for Instructor Review LA_PSY 498 Multimedia Presentation Draft Submission for Instructor Review Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFeedback Addressed and Requested 25 pts Exemplary There is clear indication of revisions that have been made resulting from Peer Review as well as specific areas of feedback being requested from the instructor. 17.5 pts Developing There is minimal indication of revisions that have been made resulting from Peer Review OR minimal indication of the specific areas of feedback being requested from the instructor. 14 pts Novice There is minimal indication of revisions that have been made resulting from Peer Review AND minimal indication of the specific areas of feedback being requested from the instructor. 0 pts Unsatisfactory No indications of revisions made or feedback requested. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation Requirements 15 pts Exemplary Presentation thoroughly incorporates all instructions for the assignment and has clearly demonstrated the requirements. 13 pts Proficient The presentation generally incorporates the instructions for the assignment and has demonstrated the requirements. 10.5 pts Developing The presentation incorporates some of the assignment requirements, with components missing. 8 pts Novice The presentation demonstrates few, if any, requirements identified in the assignment instructions. 0 pts Unsatisfactory No submission or relevance to the assignment. 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEthos/Logos/Pathos, Storytelling and Persuasiveness 12.5 pts Exemplary Ethos, logos and pathos are all strongly established and storytelling is successfully leveraged. Examples, details, and language are interesting and relevant and appropriate for the targeted audience. Engagement is maintained throughout and presentation is highly persuasive. 10 pts Proficient Ethos, logos and pathos are all established and storytelling is successfully leveraged. Examples, details, and language are generally relevant, interesting and appropriate. However, some opportunities to improve engagement with audience or enhance persuasiveness exist. 9 pts Developing Ethos, logos and/or pathos are only somewhat established and attempts to leverage storytelling are only partially successful. The presentation examples, details and language are only somewhat appropriate for the target audience. Numerous opportunities exist to enhance engagement and persuasion. 7 pts Novice Little to no ethos, logos and/or pathos established. No storytelling attempted or not relevant. Examples, details, and language are not interesting and/or relevant and/or appropriate for the targeted audience. Presentation is neither particularly engaging or persuasive. Many opportunities for improvement. 0 pts Unsatisfactory No submission or relevance to the assignment. 12.5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Delivery (Narration) 10 pts Exemplary Narration is clear, well-articulated, well-paced, and appropriately projected and significantly contributes to the engagement and persuasiveness of the presentation. 8.5 pts Proficient Narration is generally well-articulated, well-paced, and appropriately projected contributes to the engagement and persuasiveness of the presentation. Minor opportunities for improvement exist. 7 pts Developing Narration is somewhat well-articulated, well-paced, and appropriately projected. More professionally executed narration could enhance the engagement and persuasiveness of the presentation. 5.5 pts Novice Narration was unprofessional and detracted from the engagement and persuasiveness of the presentation. 0 pts Unsatisfactory No submission or relevance to the assignment. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMultimedia Elements 7.5 pts Exemplary Multimedia elements significantly enhance the engagement and persuasiveness of the presentation and are professionally executed. 6 pts Proficient Multimedia elements enhance the engagement and persuasiveness of the presentation and are generally professionally executed. 5 pts Developing Multimedia elements somewhat enhance the engagement and persuasiveness of the presentation, but could be better leveraged or more professionally executed. 4 pts Novice Multimedia elements are included but do little do to enhance the engagement or persuasiveness of the presentation and/or are executed in a manner that detracts from presentation professionalism. 0 pts Unsatisfactory No submission or relevance to the assignment. 7.5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStructure & Format 5 pts Exemplary The content of the presentation is well organized and easy to follow. There are no problems with spelling, punctuation, and grammar. Scholarly sources are appropriately cited and referenced in APA format as applicable. 4 pts Proficient The content is of the presentation is clear and easy to follow once the organization of information is realized. There are minor problems with spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar. Scholarly sources may not be appropriately cited and referenced in APA format. These problems and errors are not serious enough to distract the audience. 3.5 pts Developing The organization of material should be reconsidered. There are major problems with spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar. Citations and references are not present if needed, or have major errors in APA formatting. These problems and errors are distracting to the audience. 3 pts Novice There is no clear organization. There are major problems with spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar. Citations and references, if needed, are missing. These problems and errors are distracting to the audience. 0 pts Unsatisfactory No submission or relevance to the assignment. 5 pts Total Points: 75 PreviousNext